Skip to content

Categories:

Strategic Default on 60 Minutes

Finally, finally the media is realizing that the problem of severely underwater property is what is significant – more than the ability to pay one’s loan.   What is the point of getting a loan modification (assuming you can get it after jumping through the bank’s hoops for months and resending the financial package numerous times because they keep “losing” it) if your property is worthless?

Simply put, the Obama plan – getting the banks to agree to more loan modifications by showering them with taxpayer’s money -  wouldn’t be the answer even if it did work.   A successful loan modification on an upside down property only keeps that owner as a slave to the house.  He is nothing more than a renter.  He has no equity.  It’s worse.  he has substantial negative equity.  So even if the market does recover, he will have years to go before he even gets to zero.

Not surprisingly,  David Stevens, Commissioner of the FHA,  blatantly sided with the banks.  The banks’ misconduct in orchestrating this disaster is only half of the issue.  This assigning blame is not even the point.  As Prof. White so correctly points out in his paper (previously discussed in this blog), the homeowner is constantly being fed nonsense to just keep him paying.  Take notice of  even the subtle misstatements, for example, Stevens conceding that the properties being strategically defaulted on are almost worthless.  No sir.    They are far less than worthless!  This owner will never have equity in his home!

You may watch the entire episode here.   Look at the comments. I am still floored at the backlash towards homeowners who are defaulting on their loans.  I appreciate the emotion.  But just because you have made a decision to stay on the Titanic, doesn’t mean you should be angry with those that bailed.

Understand this clearly:   The value of the property is not that old purchase price, which is being artificially propped up by the banks and government by their campaign of harassment and guilt.  The value is what it is now.  You can face the facts or chose to ignore them and get angry at those that default.

There is so much to say and I can only stay on the soapbox for so long at a time.  Tomorrow, I will discuss the “you walk away” concept.  Good or bad?   Then we need to take a look at the alternatives available for the owner of seriously underwater property.

Be sure to visit out Main Site:

www.ReturnTheDeed.com

Posted in Uncategorized.


CBS 60 Minutes on Strategic Defaults: Walking Away From Your Mortgage

I was given advanced notice and have been waiting months for this episode of 60 Minutes to air.   I haven’t seen it yet, but will do so this evening and then offer my insights.  I am told that Morley Safer acted with his predictably  sanctimonious attitude, of course not being in this predicament himself.

60 Minutes: A Million Have Walked Away; Trend Could Undermine the Fragile Economic Recovery

One more thing:   Remember that you cannot simply walk away in many states, such as Florida and New York (among others), without running the risk of being pursued personally by the lender with a deficiency judgment.  This is crucial.

Unless you want to live under the radar for years to come, do not simply walk away!  But that does not mean you should keep making payments on your upside down property and it does not mean that you should even consider taking money from your retirement fund or kid’s college fund just to pay what is tantamount to extortion money to the bank because they refuse to give you a release.   Read my blog.  More on this later.

Source URL: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/05/06/60minutes/main6466484.shtml

Posted in Uncategorized.


Sun Sentinel: To Walk Or Not To Walk: Underwater Homeowners Face Dilemma

I was interviewed for this article which ran in Friday’s Sun Sentinel.  In working with real estate investors, we have been dealing with the pros and cons of so-called “strategic defaults” for some time now.  Most foreclosure defense lawyers have the task of keeping people in their homes.  Although this is a noble goal, it often does little more than delay the foreclosure.  On the other hand, the homeowner or investor who is upside-down typically wants nothing more than to extricate himself from the mortgage and its attendant personal liability.  This owner wants no part of delay, even if he can obtain a successful loan modification.

More and more articles are finally alerting homeowners to the real issue in this crisis:  the significant number of properties that are upside down. Most owners simply cannot come to terms with the realization that their property is totally worthless (actually negative) in value.We all hear  the question, “when will this foreclosure mess be over?”   My answer is simple:   “When the banks and government either accept the premise of principal reduction or everyone who is upside down returns the property to their lender.”

As Prof. White  points out, the policy of fear and shame has been persuading homeowners to continue paying their mortgages even though it may be clearly against their interests to do so.   In many instances it is only a matter of time before the borrower runs out of money and can no longer do so.   Having depleted his savings, he looks back wondering why he didn’t make the decision sooner.  How long can the banks and our government depend upon homeowners acting in a financially irrational manner?

Fri 05 Mar 2010

By Paul Owers, Sun Sentinel

Michael Keigans is “underwater” on his mortgage, owing $80,000 more than his Deerfield Beach house is worth.   Keigans figures it could take a decade or two to recover the lost equity, so he’s tempted to walk away, even though he has the money to pay. “Why keep putting money into a house that’s going down in value?” he asks.

It’s a question being debated in many households nationwide as the housing crunch continues. Some borrowers feel they have a moral obligation to pay the mortgage, but a growing number of homeowners and consumer advocates say walking away could be a smart business decision.     The scale of the problem is daunting: More than half of all residential mortgage holders in Broward County are underwater, California research firm First American CoreLogic said last week. In Palm Beach County, nearly half of mortgage holders fall in that category.

And there are several reason for the crisis: Homeowners who now are underwater have seen their property values plummet after they paid peak home prices from 2004 to 2006. Many of these borrowers bought with adjustable-rate mortgages, putting little or no money down. Some are underwater because they refinanced their homes at the market’s peak.

So should they walk? Hundreds of thousands of people are doing just that.    Keigans, 36, is considering it, too. First, he wants to try to unload the house in a short sale, in which a buyer would agree to pay current market value — probably no more than $200,000 — and his lender would forgive the remaining debt. If that doesn’t work, he sees little choice but to walk away.

But borrowers have to weigh several practical considerations of so-called strategic default. They risk being sued by the lender for the unpaid mortgage balance for up to 20 years. Their credit will take a huge hit, making it difficult to get a credit card or a car loan. And the poor credit rating could affect future employment and mean higher auto insurance rates.

Some homeowners, unable to strike deals with their lenders, are willing to face those consequences for the opportunity to shed burdensome mortgages.   “There is no easy way out,” said Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance, an industry newsletter.   In a recent study, global information services company Experian and consulting firm Oliver Wyman estimated that 588,000 borrowers nationwide chose to walk away from their mortgages in 2008, up 128 percent from 2007. The taboo of abandoning homes appears to be dissolving amid the mortgage meltdown, the report said.

Those who walk away and let their homes fall into foreclosure can expect to see their credit scores drop by 200 to 300 points, said Shari Olefson, a Fort Lauderdale real estate lawyer. Foreclosures stay on borrowers’ records for 10 years, and they won’t be able to get other mortgages for at least two or three years, she said.

“We should be encouraging people to meet their obligations,” said Olefson, author of Foreclosure Nation, a book about the housing downturn. “It’s the right thing to do. We should be setting a good example for our kids.”    Florida law allows lenders to seek personal judgments if homeowners default on the mortgage. The increase in homeowners walking away likely will result in more lawsuits from lenders seeking to recoup losses, credit counselors say.

There may be tax issues, too. If lenders forgive the mortgage debt, borrowers who walk away from investment properties risk having to pay federal income taxes on the forgiven amount. Forgiven mortgage debt through 2012 is not taxable income on a primary residence as long as the debt was used to buy or improve the house.     “We don’t think [walking away] is a good option for homeowners,” said Nancy Norris, a spokeswoman for banking giant Chase, which lends in all 50 states. “A mortgage is a contract. We expect you to pay the money back that you borrowed.”

But sometimes that doesn’t make financial sense, said Brent White, a University of Arizona law professor who wrote a research paper in December on underwater borrowers.

White contends that most underwater homeowners stay put to avoid the stigma of foreclosure and because of the “exaggerated anxiety over foreclosure’s perceived consequences.” Borrowers who have good credit before they walk away can rebuild their credit rating within two years of the foreclosure, White wrote.

He said homeowners should make decisions in their own best interests, without worrying about “unnecessary shame and guilt and fear.”     Lenders and other businesses break contracts without considering morals or ethics, White said.   He points out that securities giant Morgan Stanley announced plans in December to hand back to its lender five San Francisco office buildings to get out of the loan obligation.      “We have a double standard,” White said. “It’s indefensible.”

But legal, Cecala said. Businesses often buy assets by setting up corporate entities that protect them from liability. Generally, most underwriters for residential mortgages require borrowers to be on the hook personally.    Edward Sunshine, a theology professor at Barry University, says borrowers and businesses should honor their contracts if they have the financial means to do so. Deciding to walk away from a mortgage in anticipation of financial problems that have not yet happened is rationalization, he said.   “Our whole economic system is based on trust,” he said. “It is important for people to fulfill their obligations and do what they said they’d do.”

Keigans, the Deerfield Beach homeowner, bought the property for $327,000 in 2005. He didn’t make the February mortgage payment of about $2,100. And if he walks, he thinks he’ll be able to rebuild his credit faster than the house would regain the value of his mortgage.    He said he doesn’t feel the least bit guilty. He blames the banking industry for creating the mortgage mess by lowering lending standards to make homeownership attainable for many Americans who couldn’t comfortably afford it. The increased demand helped push prices to record highs.    “The financial minds that made these decisions had to know that someone making $40,000 a year couldn’t repay a $400,000 loan,” Keigans said.

Boca Raton resident Hilton Wiener said reaching out to lenders often is a waste of time.    Wiener  has tried unsuccessfully to make deals with his lenders on 10 underwater investment properties he owns across Florida. But he said they won’t work with him, either refusing to take back the properties or rejecting offers for short sales.    Unwilling to deplete his savings to cover the mortgages, Wiener has stopped making the payments. He said his first responsibility is to his family — not the banks.
“You have to make choices in life,” he said.

Walking Away From Your Property

Posted in Uncategorized.


Upside Down: When Is It Time To Make A Decision?

For years I have been discussing with investors what to do about their upside down properties.  It seems that I have been ahead of the curve on this one since I took my licks in the Houston real estate debacle in the early eighties.  I can’t remember how many times I have been asked, “Should I hold on and lose money every month or default and take my losses?”   A decision eventually has to be made.  Unfortunately, inertia usually takes over and the decision is made by non-decision.  All too often, the homeowner stops paying only after he has depleted his savings only to try and save an already worthless investment.    He pays until his money runs out and then succumbs to the inevitable.  On more than one occasion I have heard  “I have enough money to pay for another X months and then I will stop.”    How does one respond to this?

Unfortunately, some listen to the advice of misinformed “experts” like Suze Orman who pontificate against default, stating that one must honor his obligations and that the defaulting homeowner’s credit will be ruined for seven years. But, what are the alternatives?   I wonder if Suze would follow her own advice and continue to deplete her savings or get a second job to pay for worthless property if she had the problem herself. This information is propaganda from the lending institutions and is simply repeated over and over again by those who are misinformed or have not spent the time exploring the realistic alternatives.

I can’t recall the number of times I have heard  “I have an 800 credit score and it will get killed”, “I think the market will come back and I don’t want to take the loss”, or “I have a moral issue with defaulting, as my word is my bond.”   These are the kinds of statements that lead to financial ruin.  How much are you willing to pay to keep your good credit score?  In my opinion, this is the time to “stop the bleeding.”

Are we near an end to the foreclosure mess?   Not a chance.   In addition to the ever increasing number of properties owned by lenders that they can’t get rid of, there are thousands of distressed properties referred to as the “shadow market.”   These are properties that have had lis pendes or Notice of Defaults filed against them and they are not yet even listed for sale.  Then there are the millions of properties that  are “upside down” and not yet in foreclosure.  It is only a matter of time before these owners are either unable to continue making payments or “strategically default” when they realize the futility of continuing to ignore financial reality.

If you are a homeowner or investor that is upside down in your property, you should take the emotions out of your decision and treat this as a business decision. The concern should be about safeguarding your assets and making sure you are not hit with a deficiency judgment.  This is the issue, not credit score.  Don’t believe those who tell you lenders will not pursue the deficiency, just because they have not done so in the past.  Not true.  Some will and some won’t.  This can be dealt with and it requires proper planning.  The answer is not to try and pay what you cannot afford.  That advise will certainly lead to disaster.

Posted in Uncategorized.


Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Posted in Uncategorized.